TALAMANA · THE AI LITERACY MAP FOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN · Generative Mechanics · AGE 18—20 · FACTUAL · EVOLVING

The spatial instruction test

Generate ten seeds of a prompt with stated positions and score each relation and count.

When to use

Before you rely on any image model to place things where you say — and whenever a new version arrives and someone claims it "handles layout now".

The method

Write a prompt with three or four named elements in stated positions: "courtyard left of the entry, service block behind, water tank on the roof to the right". Generate ten images from ten different seeds. For each image, score each element on four things. Present? Relation satisfied — actually left of the entry, actually behind? Count right — one tank, not three? Viewpoint lets you judge the relation at all? If the viewpoint does not, mark that element unjudgeable, not wrong. Tally per element and per relation, as a rate over the ten seeds. Then swap the order you name things — put "service block" first — and run ten more. If the tally shifts towards whatever you named first, you have found first-object bias. Write the scores down with the model's name, version and the date.

Watch for this

Scoring presence when you meant to score relation. A model can put all four things in the wrong places and pass a presence tally. And scoring by "looks about right". Score each element, each relation, each image. A test without a tally is only an impression.

Try it

Run the twenty images today on whatever tool you use. Keep the sheet. Run the same twenty on the next version. Now you can say "improved" with a number instead of a feeling.

Prove it

Design a small test that proves where a model's spatial placement breaks, scored on relation and count rather than presence alone, and show the first-object bias by changing which element you name first.

How it works

Public benchmarks do exactly this at scale. VISOR scores objects and their stated relations. T2I-CompBench++ covers spatial and other kinds of composition. Both report that current models struggle with prompts that place several objects. Your ten-image version is the same logic at studio scale. EVOLVING: the scores move with every release. The method stays.

What this idea builds on

What this idea opens up

Sources

Open this idea on the map · The complete map · Logika · RBDS AI Lab, India · revised every edition.

Age grows from 11 at the centre to 22 at the edge, and six sectors show the learning strands. Tab into the map and the arrow keys step from idea to idea, following the links where there is one. Enter opens the idea under the cursor, and E reads out its links and the reason recorded on each. Press slash for Search, question mark for the full key list, and Escape to leave. Open Ideas for the complete readable list, including what each idea builds on and what it opens up.

LOGIKA · RBDS AI LAB INDIA
ON-RAMP · AGE 11 · FIRST ENCOUNTERS, NOT GATES — IDEAS · — DEPENDENCIES
DONE
OPENS NEXT
SOLID — STANDS ON